AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Emc stock splits history12/25/2023 ![]() It also has the highest percent weighting of EMC at 0.62%. The top-performing ETF of this group is RYJ with an increase of 11.29% over the last 100 days. Guggenheim Raymond James SB-1 Equity Fund ( RYJ ).The following ETF(s) have EMC as a top-10 holding: Interested in gaining exposure to EMC through an Exchange Traded Fund ? Our Dividend Calendar has the full list of stocks that have an ex-dividend today. 9%.įor more information on the declaration, record and payment dates, visit the EMC Dividend History page. Zacks Investment Research reports EMC's forecasted earnings growth in 2015 as -3.53%, compared to an industry average of. EMC's current earnings per share, an indicator of a company's profitability, is $1.25. ( TEL ) and Western Digital Corporation ( WDC ). Going forward, we maintain a high bar to add new positions, with a preference for high quality, liquid names and will continue to proactively manage existing positions.EMC is a part of the Technology sector, which includes companies such as TE Connectivity Ltd. The portfolio’s current CMBS allocation is at its lowest weighting since the inception of the fund and well diversified across multifamily, lodging, office, industrial and retail properties. We continued to reduce the portfolio’s overall exposure to CMBS over the period, mainly within fixed and floating rate (SASB) securities. Concerns about commercial real estate fundamentals continue to weigh on the market, and although valuations are compelling, we remain cautious about certain segments of commercial real estate. The portfolio’s allocation to commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) also dragged on relative performance, particularly within fixed and floating-rate single-asset, single borrower (SASB).Therefore, the portfolio’s modestly longer duration, specifically in the second half of the period when rates rose most, slightly detracted from relative performance over the period. Treasury yield moved higher from 4.87% to 5.03%. Although our allocation to high yield corporate bonds is near historic lows given the reduced availability of yield-to-call names, we continue to seek opportunities in higher quality parts of the market, such as Energy, and idiosyncratic situations associated with mergers or credit events. ![]() The short-term, high yield allocation also contributed to relative performance over the quarter given the asset classes greater carry.Over the quarter, we increased the portfolio’s allocation to ABS amid excess supply and attractive relative value. In regard to ABS, we continue to favor high-quality securities within the auto loan and consumer loan sectors, focusing on newly originated loans with superior underwriting. Our CLO allocation is very short in maturity, highly rated, and exhibits low spread volatility. The portfolio’s multi sector design provided diversification benefits and contributed to relative returns, particularly within collateralized loan obligations (CLO) and asset-backed securities (ABS).Over the period, we modestly increased the portfolio’s exposure to investment grade corporate bonds, primarily within Financials. The bank credits the portfolio holds is focused on institutions that have strong deposit franchises with robust credit cultures and strong management teams. ![]() We are more cautious on smaller regional banks and monetized on some of the portfolio’s exposure here going into earnings season. money center banks and European national champion banks. We remain conservatively positioned in Financials, overweight large U.S. More specifically, selection within the Financial and Energy sectors were positive contributors. ![]() Security selection within investment grade corporate bonds was the primary contributor to relative returns.Ratings apply to the credit worthiness of the issuers of the underlying securities and not the fund or its shares. Breakdown is not an S&P credit rating or an opinion of S&P as to the creditworthiness of such portfolio. A portion of the portfolio's securities may not be rated. Adverse conditions may affect the issuer's ability to pay interest and principal on these securities. High-yielding, non-investment-grade bonds (junk bonds) involve higher risks than investment-grade bonds. Credit ratings BB and below are lower-rated securities (junk bonds). Bonds rated BBB or above are considered investment grade. Ratings range from AAA (highest) to D (lowest). Where the rating agencies rate a security differently, Lord Abbett uses the average rating based on numeric values assigned to each rating. For certain securities that are not rated by any of these three agencies, credit ratings from other agencies may be used. agencies) provided by Standard & Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch. ![]() Treasury securities or securities issued or backed by U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |